Open

Is it a Crime to Have a Mistaken Belief in Consent?

When determining whether  an accused person is guilty of sexual assault, the Court  considers consent.

When determining whether an accused person is guilty of sexual assault, the Court considers consent.

  • If you are accused of sexual assault and can prove to the Court that you had a legitimate  and reasonable but mistaken belief that the complainant had consented to the activity in question, you will not be found guilty of sexual assault inso far as that activity is concerned.
  • Sexual assault is a criminal offence under s. 271 of the Criminal Code. Sexual assault is defined as any form of sexual contact without the consent of both parties.
  • A potential defence to sexual assault is that the accused had a “mistaken belief in consent”.
  • This defence arises in situations where the accused legitimately and reasonably believed that the complainant was consenting at the time of the alleged assault.
  • A criminal defence lawyer will consider the following two issues before raising the defence of mistaken belief in consent.

1. First, the defence lawyer must consider the subjective mental state of the accused at the time that the alleged offence was committed. The lawyer must ascertain the information known to the accused, and consider not only what the accused actually knew at the time of the sexual act, but what he or she ought to have known. In general, if a defendant tells his or her criminal defence lawyer that he or she actually believed that the complainant was consenting, the defence lawyer will want to raise the defence of mistaken belief in consent.

2. The defence lawyer must also consider the objective component of the defence of mistaken belief before he or she will raise the defence. The lawyer must ascertain whether a reasonable person, aware of the circumstances known to the accused at the time of the offence, would have taken further steps to confirm that the accused was consenting before proceeding with the sexual activity. In other words, at this stage the defence lawyer must consider whether the average person, if he or she was “in the defendant’s shoes” would have been satisfied that the complainant was actually consenting to the sexual act. If the average person would not have been satisfied that the complainant was consenting, the mistaken belief claim is not available.

  • However, if the defence lawyer determines that average person would have been satisfied that the complainant was consenting or if the answer is ambiguous, then the lawyer will raise the mistaken belief defence.
  • Once the defence of mistaken belief is raised, the court will consider all of the circumstances to first assess whether or not the defence has “an air of reality”, and determine what information to believe. On the basis of the information that the court accepts as true, the court will determine
  • (i) that the accused genuinely believed that the complainant was consenting at the time of the offence (the subjective component), and
  • (ii) that a reasonable person, in the same circumstances as the accused and with the same knowledge as the accused had at the time, would have been satisfied that the complainant was consenting to the sexual act. If the court has any reasonable doubt, the benefit of doubt must go to defendant.

There are some limits of the defence of mistaken belief in consent.

1. If the accused’s belief in consent arose from the self-induced intoxication, or recklessness or wilful blindness, the defence of mistaken belief will not be available.

2. Before raising the defence, the accused must first show that they took reasonable steps to ascertain whether or not the plaintiff is consenting. This is a procedural hurdle the defendant’s criminal defence lawyer must get through before he or she can raise the defence of mistaken belief.

  • The defence of mistaken belief in consent often comes down to what criminal defence lawyers call a “battle of credibility”. Only the accused and the complainant can ever really know what happened during the sexual encounter.
  • Thus, the legal question of whether or not the complainant consented invariably comes down to a question of who the court chooses to believe: the complainant or the defendant. Presenting a clear and consistent testimony of what happened is the defendant’s best bet for being believed in the court room.
  • If you have been charged with sexual assault or any other criminal offence, contact Kostman and Pyzer, Barristers for you free consultation!

 

 

21 Nov 2017

Leave a Comment