(416) 658-1818free case evaluation 1

Recent Case Summaries

Charges Withdrawn

Fail to Comply with Recognizance

R. v. M.D.

Client was charged with failing to comply with his bail conditions. Police observed him in a vehicle with a passenger at 4:30 am while bound by a curfew between 10:00 pm and 6:00 am. We successfully had the charge withdrawn.

Outcome: Charge withdrawn, no criminal record.

Acquittal

Breach of Recognizance

R. vs A.W.

Client was charged with two counts of breaching his bail conditions by allegedly contacting his former common law partner while on release for assault and sexual assault charges. He was denied bail on the breach charges and held in custody. We secured a quick trial date and argued the phone call was accidental, not intentional contact.

Outcome: Acquitted at trial, court found reasonable doubt on intent, released from custody.

Criminal Charge Withdrawn

Driving Over 80

R. v. W.

Client was charged with driving over 80 mg after being stopped at a RIDE checkpoint. Despite no visible signs of impairment, his breath samples showed 130 mg. We negotiated extensively with the Crown to have the criminal charge reduced to a provincial offence.

Outcome: Criminal charge withdrawn, client pleaded to careless driving under the Highway Traffic Act, no criminal record.

Charges Dismissed

Driving Over 80

R. v. H.

Client was charged with driving over 80 mg after being stopped at a RIDE checkpoint following a concert. As a public transit mechanic, a conviction would have cost him his job. We successfully defended him at trial.

Outcome: Charge dismissed at trial, employment preserved, no criminal record.

Acquittal

Impaired Driving

R. v. S.

Client was followed by an off-duty police officer on a Sunday afternoon due to allegedly erratic driving. He was arrested and charged with impaired driving after breathalyzer readings showed approximately 300, nearly four times the legal limit. We successfully defended him at trial.

Outcome: Acquitted of all charges at trial, no criminal record.

Charges Stayed

Impaired Driving and Over 80

R. v. M.

Client was charged with impaired driving and driving over 80 mg. We filed a successful Charter application arguing that the delay in bringing him to trial breached his right to be tried within a reasonable time under section 11(b).

Outcome: All charges stayed due to Charter breach, no criminal record.

Request a Free Case Evaluation

Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
cc470f88f44623e089d029d5d82ac01a721de89d3e234a07e395b544cdd7994e1e84f089a5134fc9a05a79762569fb172ca78c4ba562437528f7224ab60d4de8d5188cec925a9f154dcee647500bae18 215875d5fcc6be39e83c230aba39ce05e6dc5ab4b
5.0
Trusted by over 140 people
Call Us 24/7