The client was charged with criminal harassment. It was alleged that he made numerous threatening calls to his estranged wife. Mr. Kostman acted for H., The charges were dismissed after trial since there was only evidence of motive and no specific evidence as to the source of the telephone calls.
Case Summary
R. v. H.
Summary of Case
Disclaimer: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique, and results depend on specific facts and circumstances.
Request a Free
Case Evaluation
5.0
Related Cases
R. v. R.N. | Charges Withdrawn
Possession of Stolen Property
The client, a young offender, was charged with possession of property obtained by crime after police located him and others following a reported break-in attempt. The client had made a statement to police admitting the property in his possession was stolen. Despite the admission, we negotiated a diversion program with the Crown. Upon completion, the charge was withdrawn.
Outcome: No youth record, no trial, charge withdrawn completely.
The client was charged with theft under $5,000 after allegedly shoplifting from a retail store. We successfully negotiated a diversion program. Upon completing the program requirements, the Crown withdrew the charge.
Outcome: No criminal record, no trial, charge withdrawn completely.
R. v. T.Y. | Charges Withdrawn
Possession of Stolen Property
The client, a young offender, faced four counts of possession of property obtained by crime after police observed him loading stolen motor vehicle engines into a vehicle during an undercover investigation. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of all charges before trial.
Outcome: No youth record, no trial, all charges withdrawn completely.
