(416) 658-1818free case evaluation 1
Case Summary

R. v. J.A.

Summary of Case

The accused, J.A. was charged with one count of domestic assault and one count of assault causing bodily harm. At the time of the alleged assault J.A. was in an eight month long romantic relationship with the complainant, a woman he had known for seventeen years. It was alleged that he and the complainant got into a verbal argument that escalated, during which the complainant attempted to leave. It was alleged that J.A. then grabbed her by her shoulders, shaking her, eventually pushing her to the ground and punching her in the face. He then placed her in a bear hug preventing her escape. J.A. maintained his innocence throughout the ordeal. According to him, the complainant had acted vindictively. She had fabricated the alleged assault to punish him for ending their relationship.  Jonathan Pyzer represented J.A. in the Ontario Court of Justice and was successful at having all of the charges against him dismissed. The defence was able to exploit the lengthy delay for the accused’s benefit. As well, the defence marshaled a great number of witnesses demonstrating to the court that the complainant was untruthful in her statement to the police regarding J.A.’s actions.

Request a Free Case Evaluation
Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
cc470f88f44623e089d029d5d82ac01a721de89d3e234a07e395b544cdd7994e1e84f089a5134fc9a05a79762569fb172ca78c4ba562437528f7224ab60d4de8d5188cec925a9f154dcee647500bae18 215875d5fcc6be39e83c230aba39ce05e6dc5ab4b

5.0

Related Cases

Charges Withdrawn

Possession of Stolen Property

R. v. R.N.

Client, a young offender, was charged with possession of property obtained by crime after police located him and others following a reported break-in attempt. The client had made a statement to police admitting the property in his possession was stolen. Despite the admission, we negotiated a diversion program with the Crown. Upon completion, the charge was withdrawn.

Outcome: No youth record, no trial, charge withdrawn completely.

Charges Withdrawn

Theft

R. v. K.D.

Client, a young offender, was charged with theft under $5,000 after store security observed her concealing merchandise and leaving a retail store without paying. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of the charge before trial with no admission of guilt.

Outcome: No youth record, no admission of guilt, charge withdrawn completely.

Charges Withdrawn

Theft, Assault with Intent to Resist Arrest, Possession of Stolen Property

R. v. T.L.

Client faced charges of theft under $5,000, assault with intent to resist arrest, and possession of stolen property after an incident at a retail store. Store security alleged the client concealed items and assaulted a security officer during an attempted arrest. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of all charges before trial with no admission of guilt.

Outcome: No criminal record, no admission of guilt, all charges withdrawn completely.

Don't Face Criminal Charges Alone

Criminal charges can have serious consequences for your freedom, reputation, and future. Get experienced legal representation from Toronto's trusted criminal defence lawyers. Contact us today at (416) 658-1818 to schedule your free consultation.

Emergency (416) 658-1818
5.0

Based on reviews150+

Our Client Commitment
  • Free initial consultation and case evaluation
  • 24/7 emergency availability for arrests
  • Direct lawyer contact, not paralegals
  • Transparent, predictable legal fees
  • Defence of your Charter rights
  • Complete confidentiality and discretion
pyzer logo white bg img

Request a Free Case Evaluation

Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
cc470f88f44623e089d029d5d82ac01a721de89d3e234a07e395b544cdd7994e1e84f089a5134fc9a05a79762569fb172ca78c4ba562437528f7224ab60d4de8d5188cec925a9f154dcee647500bae18 215875d5fcc6be39e83c230aba39ce05e6dc5ab4b
5.0
Trusted by over 140 people
Call Us 24/7