The accused, J.K. was charged with assault with a weapon contrary to section 267 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The accused attacked and injured the victim with a knife during a heated argument and was held under arrest after. The accused was then released on a conditional undertaking. Counsel was successfully able to go through, and conduct thorough analysis of all evidence, and identify the weaknesses in the crown’s case. Which made him able to prove to the crown counsel that there was no reasonable prospect of conviction and had all charges withdrawn.
R. v. J.K.
Summary of Case
Related Cases
Charges Withdrawn
R. v. R.N.
Client, a young offender, was charged with possession of property obtained by crime after police located him and others following a reported break-in attempt. The client had made a statement to police admitting the property in his possession was stolen. Despite the admission, we negotiated a diversion program with the Crown. Upon completion, the charge was withdrawn.
Charges Withdrawn
R. v. K.D.
Client, a young offender, was charged with theft under $5,000 after store security observed her concealing merchandise and leaving a retail store without paying. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of the charge before trial with no admission of guilt.
Charges Withdrawn
R. v. T.L.
Client faced charges of theft under $5,000, assault with intent to resist arrest, and possession of stolen property after an incident at a retail store. Store security alleged the client concealed items and assaulted a security officer during an attempted arrest. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of all charges before trial with no admission of guilt.




