(416) 658-1818free case evaluation 1
Case Summary

R. v. K.A.

Summary of Case

K.A. and the complainant struggled with ongoing issues and tensions throughout their tenant and landlord relationship. K.A. was upset that the complainant, his landlord, had not fixed K.A.’s leaky roof. Under the conditions of K.A.’s signed commercial lease, the complainant was supposed to fix the roof within 45 days of K.A. possessing the unit. Three months had gone by and the leaky roof was still not fixed. After the complainant failed to respond to any correspondence from K.A. to rectify the situation, K.A. went to approach him in the office. There, K.A. admittedly lost his temper and the police were called. The police arrived and K.A. was charged with one count of uttering threats and one count of criminal harassment by engaging in threatening conduct towards his landlord. To be convicted of uttering threats the Crown has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that K.A. knowingly conveyed to cause death or bodily harm to the complainant. To be found guilty of criminal harassment the Crown has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that K.A. engaged in threatening conduct directed at the complainant which caused the complainant to reasonably, in all the circumstances, fear for their safety. The weight of evidence against K.A. on both charges was overwhelming; not only did K.A. admit to the police he lost his temper and threatened to “knock out” the complainant several times, the complainant audio recorded the threats allegedly made by K.A., there was a witness, and the complainant reasonably, in all of the circumstances, feared for his safety. Under the Canadian Criminal Code, K.A. was facing up to five years in prison for the uttering threats charge and ten years in prison for the criminal harassment charge. Jonathan Pyzer successfully advocated for both of K.A.’s charges to be withdrawn by the Crown. K.A. therefore did not face a finding of guilt and does not have a criminal record as a result of this incident. Instead, K.A. had to agree to sign a section 810 peace bond with conditions he keep the peace, be of good behaviour, not have contact with the complainant, and not to possess any weapons for twelve months. The section 810 peace bond was of $500.00 with no deposits, meaning if K.A. breached any of his conditions he would then have to pay the court $500.00. At the time of his charges, K.A. was applying to be a Canadian citizen. Since both of K.A.’s charges were indictable offences, a finding of guilt on either charge would have had a devastating effect on his ability to become a Canadian citizen. Having a criminal record and going through a prison sentence could severely affect all aspects of your life, and Jonathan Pyzer recognizes the importance of avoiding those outcomes at all costs.

Request a Free Case Evaluation
Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
cc470f88f44623e089d029d5d82ac01a721de89d3e234a07e395b544cdd7994e1e84f089a5134fc9a05a79762569fb172ca78c4ba562437528f7224ab60d4de8d5188cec925a9f154dcee647500bae18 215875d5fcc6be39e83c230aba39ce05e6dc5ab4b

5.0

Related Cases

Charges Withdrawn

Possession of Stolen Property

R. v. R.N.

Client, a young offender, was charged with possession of property obtained by crime after police located him and others following a reported break-in attempt. The client had made a statement to police admitting the property in his possession was stolen. Despite the admission, we negotiated a diversion program with the Crown. Upon completion, the charge was withdrawn.

Outcome: No youth record, no trial, charge withdrawn completely.

Charges Withdrawn

Theft

R. v. K.D.

Client, a young offender, was charged with theft under $5,000 after store security observed her concealing merchandise and leaving a retail store without paying. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of the charge before trial with no admission of guilt.

Outcome: No youth record, no admission of guilt, charge withdrawn completely.

Charges Withdrawn

Theft, Assault with Intent to Resist Arrest, Possession of Stolen Property

R. v. T.L.

Client faced charges of theft under $5,000, assault with intent to resist arrest, and possession of stolen property after an incident at a retail store. Store security alleged the client concealed items and assaulted a security officer during an attempted arrest. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of all charges before trial with no admission of guilt.

Outcome: No criminal record, no admission of guilt, all charges withdrawn completely.

Don't Face Criminal Charges Alone

Criminal charges can have serious consequences for your freedom, reputation, and future. Get experienced legal representation from Toronto's trusted criminal defence lawyers. Contact us today at (416) 658-1818 to schedule your free consultation.

Emergency (416) 658-1818
5.0

Based on reviews150+

Our Client Commitment
  • Free initial consultation and case evaluation
  • 24/7 emergency availability for arrests
  • Direct lawyer contact, not paralegals
  • Transparent, predictable legal fees
  • Defence of your Charter rights
  • Complete confidentiality and discretion
pyzer logo white bg img

Request a Free Case Evaluation

Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
cc470f88f44623e089d029d5d82ac01a721de89d3e234a07e395b544cdd7994e1e84f089a5134fc9a05a79762569fb172ca78c4ba562437528f7224ab60d4de8d5188cec925a9f154dcee647500bae18 215875d5fcc6be39e83c230aba39ce05e6dc5ab4b
5.0
Trusted by over 140 people
Call Us 24/7