(416) 658-1818free case evaluation 1
Case Summary

R. v. K.S.

Summary of Case

K.S., was charged with possession of hashish. The allegations against K.S., were that he was a passenger in a vehicle that was in a motor vehicle incident. The police attended at the scene of the accident and observed the motor vehicle laying on its roof and the vehicle demolished. The two occupants of the motor vehicle were investigated by members of the Ontario provincial police and found to be in possession of a small package that contained 3.5g of hashish. Both accused allegedly confessed to the investigating officer that the hashish belonged to them. Mr. Pyzer represented K.S., and was successful in having the charge against him withdrawn prior to setting a trial date. As such, K.S., does not have a criminal record as a result of this charge.

Request a Free Case Evaluation
Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
cc470f88f44623e089d029d5d82ac01a721de89d3e234a07e395b544cdd7994e1e84f089a5134fc9a05a79762569fb172ca78c4ba562437528f7224ab60d4de8d5188cec925a9f154dcee647500bae18 215875d5fcc6be39e83c230aba39ce05e6dc5ab4b

5.0

Related Cases

Charges Withdrawn

Possession of Stolen Property

R. v. R.N.

Client, a young offender, was charged with possession of property obtained by crime after police located him and others following a reported break-in attempt. The client had made a statement to police admitting the property in his possession was stolen. Despite the admission, we negotiated a diversion program with the Crown. Upon completion, the charge was withdrawn.

Outcome: No youth record, no trial, charge withdrawn completely.

Charges Withdrawn

Theft

R. v. K.D.

Client, a young offender, was charged with theft under $5,000 after store security observed her concealing merchandise and leaving a retail store without paying. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of the charge before trial with no admission of guilt.

Outcome: No youth record, no admission of guilt, charge withdrawn completely.

Charges Withdrawn

Theft, Assault with Intent to Resist Arrest, Possession of Stolen Property

R. v. T.L.

Client faced charges of theft under $5,000, assault with intent to resist arrest, and possession of stolen property after an incident at a retail store. Store security alleged the client concealed items and assaulted a security officer during an attempted arrest. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of all charges before trial with no admission of guilt.

Outcome: No criminal record, no admission of guilt, all charges withdrawn completely.

Don't Face Criminal Charges Alone

Criminal charges can have serious consequences for your freedom, reputation, and future. Get experienced legal representation from Toronto's trusted criminal defence lawyers. Contact us today at (416) 658-1818 to schedule your free consultation.

Emergency (416) 658-1818
5.0

Based on reviews150+

Our Client Commitment
  • Free initial consultation and case evaluation
  • 24/7 emergency availability for arrests
  • Direct lawyer contact, not paralegals
  • Transparent, predictable legal fees
  • Defence of your Charter rights
  • Complete confidentiality and discretion
pyzer logo white bg img

Request a Free Case Evaluation

Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
cc470f88f44623e089d029d5d82ac01a721de89d3e234a07e395b544cdd7994e1e84f089a5134fc9a05a79762569fb172ca78c4ba562437528f7224ab60d4de8d5188cec925a9f154dcee647500bae18 215875d5fcc6be39e83c230aba39ce05e6dc5ab4b
5.0
Trusted by over 140 people
Call Us 24/7