The accused, M.S., was charged with failure to comply with a recognizance (bail order). The allegations were that in march 2007, while bound by a curfew between the hours of 10:00 pm and 6:00, M.S., was observed by the police to be in a vehicle at 4:30 am with a female occupant. Mr. Pyzer was successful in having all of the charges against M.S., withdrawn.
Case Summary
R. v. M.D.
Related Cases
Charges Withdrawn
Possession of Stolen Property
R. v. R.N.
Client, a young offender, was charged with possession of property obtained by crime after police located him and others following a reported break-in attempt. The client had made a statement to police admitting the property in his possession was stolen. Despite the admission, we negotiated a diversion program with the Crown. Upon completion, the charge was withdrawn.
Outcome: No youth record, no trial, charge withdrawn completely.
Charges Withdrawn
Theft
R. v. K.D.
Client, a young offender, was charged with theft under $5,000 after store security observed her concealing merchandise and leaving a retail store without paying. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of the charge before trial with no admission of guilt.
Outcome: No youth record, no admission of guilt, charge withdrawn completely.
Charges Withdrawn
Theft, Assault with Intent to Resist Arrest, Possession of Stolen Property
R. v. T.L.
Client faced charges of theft under $5,000, assault with intent to resist arrest, and possession of stolen property after an incident at a retail store. Store security alleged the client concealed items and assaulted a security officer during an attempted arrest. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of all charges before trial with no admission of guilt.
Outcome: No criminal record, no admission of guilt, all charges withdrawn completely.
