The accused, R.E., a young offender, was charged with failure to comply with a recognizance (bail order) and failure to comply with an undertaking given to a police officer. The allegations against R.E., were that he was investigated by the police while he was out of his residence past his curfew. Mr. Pyzer was successful in having all of the charges against R.E., withdrawn.
Case Summary
R. v. R.E.
Summary of Case
Disclaimer: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is unique, and results depend on specific facts and circumstances.
Request a Free
Case Evaluation
5.0
Related Cases
R. v. R.N. | Charges Withdrawn
Possession of Stolen Property
The client, a young offender, was charged with possession of property obtained by crime after police located him and others following a reported break-in attempt. The client had made a statement to police admitting the property in his possession was stolen. Despite the admission, we negotiated a diversion program with the Crown. Upon completion, the charge was withdrawn.
Outcome: No youth record, no trial, charge withdrawn completely.
The client was charged with theft under $5,000 after allegedly shoplifting from a retail store. We successfully negotiated a diversion program. Upon completing the program requirements, the Crown withdrew the charge.
Outcome: No criminal record, no trial, charge withdrawn completely.
R. v. T.Y. | Charges Withdrawn
Possession of Stolen Property
The client, a young offender, faced four counts of possession of property obtained by crime after police observed him loading stolen motor vehicle engines into a vehicle during an undercover investigation. We negotiated with the Crown and secured a withdrawal of all charges before trial.
Outcome: No youth record, no trial, all charges withdrawn completely.
